The Organization of Research
Sunday, June 24th, 2007Before any allergy problem is solved, or any theory of allergy is tested, certain fundamental criteria must be satisfied. A patient who receives a drug may not be aware of the planning and thought that went into the research leading to approval of the drag or drags the patient uses and depends on every day. The question to be answered in the research must first be identified clearly. Then time and effort must be devoted to organizing the research. For example, how many subjects should be used? How many comparison groups? How many observations, and what type, should be made? What should be the duration of observations for the observations to be meaningful? For comparisons to be statistically significant, the volunteers must be allocated without bias to treatment groups. Researchers are constantly concerned about how data is collected so that results will be unbiased and valid. It is no wonder that researchers become upset when unsubstantiated, sensational statements are made claiming, for instance, breakthroughs in research. Unless hypotheses and breakthroughs in therapy are confirmed by scientific tests and properly designed experimentation, they do not deserve public acceptance and confidence. In reviewing research in the field of allergy, both current and future, researchers often start with population studies that have been used to gain information about the characteristics of an allergic disease and the frequency with which it occurs.
